%-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % File : LCL051-1 : TPTP v2.1.0. Released v1.0.0. % Domain : Logic Calculi (Implication/Negation 2 valued sentential) % Problem : CN-22 depends on the Lukasiewicz system % Version : [McC92] axioms. % English : Axiomatisations of the Implication/Negation 2 valued % sentential calculus are {CN-1,CN-2,CN-3} by Lukasiewicz, % {CN-18,CN-21,CN-35,CN-39,CN-39,CN-40,CN-46} by Frege, % {CN-3,CN-18,CN-21,CN-22,CN-30,CN-54} by Hilbert, {CN-18, % CN-35,CN-49} by Church, {CN-19,CN-37,CN-59} by Lukasiewicz, % {CN-19,CN-37,CN-60} by Wos, and the single Meredith axiom. % Show that CN-22 depends on the short Lukasiewicz system. % Refs : [LM92] Lusk & McCune (1992), Experiments with ROO, a Parallel % : [MW92] McCune & Wos (1992), Experiments in Automated Deductio % : [McC92] McCune (1992), Email to G. Sutcliffe % Source : [McC92] % Names : CD-12 [LM92] % : CN-12 [MW92] % Status : unsatisfiable % Rating : 0.78 v2.1.0, 0.88 v2.0.0 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 5 ( 0 non-Horn; 4 unit; 2 RR) % Number of literals : 7 ( 0 equality) % Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 average) % Number of predicates : 1 ( 0 propositional; 1-1 arity) % Number of functors : 5 ( 3 constant; 0-2 arity) % Number of variables : 8 ( 1 singleton) % Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 average) % Comments : % : tptp2X -f tptp -t rm_equality:rstfp LCL051-1.p %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- input_clause(condensed_detachment,axiom, [-- is_a_theorem(implies(X, Y)), -- is_a_theorem(X), ++ is_a_theorem(Y)]). input_clause(cn_1,axiom, [++ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X, Y), implies(implies(Y, Z), implies(X, Z))))]). input_clause(cn_2,axiom, [++ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X), X), X))]). input_clause(cn_3,axiom, [++ is_a_theorem(implies(X, implies(not(X), Y)))]). input_clause(prove_cn_22,conjecture, [-- is_a_theorem(implies(implies(b, c), implies(implies(a, b), implies(a, c))))]). %--------------------------------------------------------------------------